Article Overview

The feature article explores practical techniques for optimizing FPGA designs using advanced synthesis tools. Using a real-world doppler radar signal processing application as a case study, the article demonstrates how intelligent application of Precision Physical Synthesis can yield dramatic improvements in design efficiency.

Key Topics Covered

• Introduction to Precision Physical Synthesis
• Doppler radar signal processing requirements
• Traditional synthesis vs. physical synthesis approaches
• Step-by-step optimization methodology
• Measured results and cost analysis
• Best practices for FPGA optimization

The Challenge: Doppler Radar Processing

Application Requirements

The case study focused on a doppler radar signal processing system with demanding requirements:

• Real-time Processing: Continuous data streams from radar receiver
• High Throughput: Multiple FFTs per second for target detection
• Latency Constraints: Sub-millisecond processing requirements
• Multiple Channels: Parallel processing of antenna array data
• Cost Sensitivity: Commercial application requiring cost optimization

Initial Design Challenge

The initial FPGA implementation exceeded the target device capacity:

Resource	Used	Available	Utilization
LUTs	42,500	41,000	104% ❌
Flip-Flops	38,200	82,000	47%
BRAM	85	120	71%
DSP48	58	90	64%

The design exceeded LUT capacity, requiring a larger (more expensive) FPGA

The Solution: Precision Physical Synthesis

What is Precision Physical Synthesis?

Precision Physical Synthesis is an advanced FPGA synthesis technique that considers physical placement and routing during the synthesis process, rather than treating them as separate steps. This allows the synthesis tool to make better optimization decisions based on actual routing delays and resource availability.

Key Techniques Applied

1. Physical Optimization During Synthesis

• Synthesis considers actual placement locations
• Logic optimization based on real routing delays
• Retiming across physical boundaries
• Resource balancing across die regions

2. Intelligent Register Retiming

• Registers moved through logic for better timing
• Pipeline balancing across clock domains
• Automatic insertion of pipeline stages where beneficial

3. Logic Replication and Duplication

• Strategic duplication of logic to reduce fanout
• Replication to improve routability
• Balanced approach to avoid excessive growth

4. Cross-Boundary Optimization

• Optimization across module boundaries
• Hierarchical design flattening where beneficial
• Global rather than local optimization view

Implementation Process

Step-by-Step Methodology

Step 1: Baseline Synthesis

Started with standard synthesis to establish baseline:

• Traditional synthesis flow
• Default optimization settings
• No physical awareness
• Result: 104% LUT utilization (doesn't fit)

Step 2: Enable Physical Synthesis

Activated Precision Physical Synthesis features:

• Enabled physical optimization
• Set appropriate effort levels
• Configured retiming options
• Result: 92% LUT utilization (fits, but tight)

Step 3: Iterative Refinement

Fine-tuned optimization parameters:

• Adjusted critical path priorities
• Balanced optimization vs. runtime
• Targeted specific bottlenecks
• Result: 85% LUT utilization (comfortable margin)

Step 4: Verification

Verified optimized design:

• Functional equivalence checking
• Timing analysis confirmation
• Hardware verification
• Performance validation

Results and Benefits

Resource Reduction

Cost Impact

The ability to use a smaller FPGA translated to significant cost savings:

• Per-Unit Savings: $110 per unit
• Production Volume: 5,000 units per year
• Annual Savings: $550,000
• 3-Year Savings: $1.65 million

Additional Benefits

• Lower Power: Smaller device consumes less power
• Better Margins: More comfortable resource utilization
• Faster Timing: Improved clock frequency
• Future Headroom: Space for future enhancements

Best Practices and Lessons Learned

When to Use Physical Synthesis

Physical synthesis is most beneficial when:

• Design is close to device capacity
• Timing closure is challenging
• Routing congestion is an issue
• Cost optimization is important
• Multiple clock domains present

Implementation Tips

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

• Over-constraining the design
• Ignoring hierarchy guidelines
• Not allowing sufficient synthesis runtime
• Skipping verification steps
• Using aggressive settings everywhere

Industry Impact

Broader Applications

The techniques described in the article apply to many FPGA applications:

• Communications systems
• Image processing
• Machine learning inference
• High-speed interfaces
• Test and measurement equipment

Industry Response

The article generated significant interest in the FPGA community:

• Featured on Chip Design Magazine cover
• High online readership and engagement
• Positive feedback from engineers and managers
• Referenced in subsequent technical publications

About the Author

Related Articles and Resources

From Dillon Engineering

• FPGA Design HowTo Guides
• FFT IP Core Success Stories
• Company Overview and Expertise

Technical Presentations

• HPEC 2007: "Accelerating Algorithm Implementation in FPGA/ASIC Using Python"
• HPEC 2004: "An Efficient Architecture for Ultra Long FFTs in FPGAs and ASICs"
• FPGA Webcast: "FPGA Design for Complex Systems"

Request the Full Article

Consulting Services

FPGA Optimization Consulting

Dillon Engineering offers consulting services to help optimize your FPGA designs:

• Design Review: Analysis of existing designs for optimization opportunities
• Synthesis Optimization: Expert application of advanced synthesis techniques
• Timing Closure: Assistance achieving timing goals
• Resource Reduction: Strategies to fit designs in smaller devices
• Training: Transfer knowledge to your team

Success Stories

We've helped numerous customers optimize their FPGA designs:

• Reduced device cost by 30-50% in multiple projects
• Achieved timing closure for designs that initially failed
• Enabled use of smaller FPGAs through optimization
• Improved power efficiency through resource reduction
• Accelerated time-to-market through expert assistance

About Chip Design Magazine

Chip Design Magazine is a leading publication serving the semiconductor and electronic design automation (EDA) industry. The magazine covers:

• FPGA and ASIC design techniques
• EDA tool innovations
• Design verification methodologies
• Industry trends and analysis
• Case studies from leading companies

Media and Press

Additional Coverage

Dillon Engineering has been featured in numerous industry publications:

• FPGA Journal: "Achieving World-Class FFT Performance"
• EE Times: "DSP Implementation Best Practices"
• Xcell Journal: "Optimizing for Xilinx FPGAs"
• Design & Reuse: "IP Core Selection Guide"

Conference Presentations

We regularly present at industry conferences:

• HPEC (High Performance Embedded Computing)
• FPL (Field Programmable Logic and Applications)
• DATE (Design, Automation & Test in Europe)
• Xilinx Developer Forum
• Embedded Systems Conference

Apply These Techniques to Your Designs

Stay Connected

Stay informed about new articles, technical papers, and innovations from Dillon Engineering:

• Subscribe to our technical newsletter
• Follow our conference presentations
• Read our latest application notes
• Access our growing library of technical resources

← Back to News